Choosing the right Performing Rights Organization (PRO) ensures your royalties are collected when music is publicly performed. Here’s a quick guide to global options:

ASCAP (USA)

• Pros: Non-profit, transparent, educational resources.
• Cons: $50 fee, high competition.

BMI (USA)

• Pros: No fee, artist development, flexible agreements.
• Cons: Less frequent payments, higher administrative costs.

SESAC (USA, by invitation)

• Pros: Personalized service, efficient payments.
• Cons: Invitation-only, for-profit structure.

PRS for Music (UK)

• Pros: Global reach, regular payments.
• Cons: Membership fees, complex structure.

SOCAN (Canada)

• Pros: Member-focused, innovative tracking.
• Cons: Administrative fees, potential delays.

APRA AMCOS (Australia/New Zealand)

• Pros: Strong regional presence, comprehensive services.
• Cons: Membership fees, complexity in managing rights.

GEMA (Germany)

• Pros: Precise tracking, strong European network, professional support.
• Cons: Membership fees, bureaucratic processes.

SACEM (France)

• Pros: Extensive network, comprehensive services, legal assistance.
• Cons: Membership fees, complex administration.

SGAE (Spain)

• Pros: Cultural focus, wide coverage, educational resources.
• Cons: Membership fees, potential payment delays.

BUMA/STEMRA (Netherlands)

• Pros: Strong regional support, precise tracking.
• Cons: Membership fees, complex registration

Factors to Consider

• Career Stage: Emerging artists might prefer BMI or SOCAN; established ones might lean towards ASCAP, PRS, or GEMA.
• Support and Services: Consider workshops, networking events, and resources.
• Payment and Transparency: Evaluate royalty payment practices.
• Flexibility: Look into contractual terms and regional reach.

Expertise in PRO Deal Brokering

We specialize in brokering PRO deals, securing optimal terms and protections for our clients.

Conclusion

Choosing the right PRO maximizes earnings and safeguards rights. For expert assistance in brokering PRO deals, contact us.